I'm dashing between work and a lecture, so this will be brief and probably edited later once I've had a chance to sit down and read through all of it, but for reference:
This is the report that the Washington Post sensationalised.
In my original comment to
wobowikkles's post I said my main concern was that men's health and its impact on having healthy babies was not mentioned at all. That's true of the Washington Post's article, but the report is far more balanced (e.g. referring to "women and couples" or "men and women", from what I've skimmed) and on that basis I'd at least partially retract that argument.
Pandagon, which is an all-round excellent blog, has a very good article on both the Washington Post article and the actual report here (second point of the post).
This is the report that the Washington Post sensationalised.
In my original comment to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Pandagon, which is an all-round excellent blog, has a very good article on both the Washington Post article and the actual report here (second point of the post).